What
is an interactive key?
Traditional printed dichotomous keys offer
the user a series of paired contrasting “couplets,” arranged
in a fixed sequence, that lead the user though a series of choices of
characteristics about a particular organism. For example,
| 1 |
With
wings |
2 |
| |
Without
wings |
Collembola |
| 2 |
With
two pairs of wings |
3 |
| |
With
one pair of wings |
Diptera |
| 3 |
Forewings
membranous |
4 |
| |
Forewings
modified as hardened elytra |
Coleoptera |
| 4 |
Forewings
covered with scales |
Lepidoptera |
| |
Forewings
covered with hairs |
Trichoptera |
Starting
at couplet 1, the user observes the specimen in hand to determine if
it has wings of not. If not, the identification is made and the specimen
is a collembolan. If the specimen has wings, the user is directed to
go to couplet 2 for an additional choice of characters, and so on.
Of course, dichotomous keys are usually associated with illustrations
or photographs to aid the user, and there can be more than one character
included within a couplet. For example,
| 1 |
With
wings (Fig. 1); without a jumping mechanism or furculum on the
abdomen |
2 |
| |
Without
wings; with a jumping mechanism or furculum on the abdomen (Fig.
2) |
Collembola |
Dichotomous
keys are a type of single-access key
in that the user enters the key at only one place, in this case at
couplet 1, and works though the key one couplet at a time until an
identification is made. Most taxonomic keys published today are dichotomous
and while there are strengths and weakness of dichotomous keys, they
offer a powerful tool for identifying organisms (Winston 1999).
Interactive keys, on the other
hand, offer a completely different approach to identification. Interactive
keys are computer based and are written and accessed through specifically
designed software (INTKEY and Lucid, being perhaps the most popular interactive
key applications in use today, but there are others). Interactive keys are
structured on a feature by entity matrix.
Each entity is scored for a particular characteristic or feature it possesses.
For example,
Feature/Entity |
Coleoptera |
Collembola |
Diptera |
Hemiptera |
Odonata |
Trichoptera |
| no
wings |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
| one
pair |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
| two
pairs, forewings elytra |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
| two
pairs, forewings hemelytra |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
| two
pairs, forewings membranous |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
Features contain a varying number of states.
For example, the feature antennae might have the states capitate, clavate, filiform,
etc. In biology, these are referred to as characters and character states,
and generally refer to morphological structures, but features can pertain
to inanimate objects as well (soil types, cloud formations, bones, etc.).
Similarly, in biology, entities are usually species or higher taxa, in
this case aquatic insect orders.
One advantage to interactive keys is that the matrix can be scored to
account for user error, uncertainty, misinterpretation of a state, or
rare features, among others. For example, damselfly nymphs have three
caudal tracheal gills at the end of the abdomen, but these are easily
broken off collected specimens. The matrix can accommodate this fact
by scoring the state as “present”
(commonly) or as “absent” (misinterpreted). While the matrix
forms the backbone of the key, it is not seen or accessed by the user.
Instead the user accesses or “plays” the key through an additional
application of the software and is presented with a choice of features
and their states. States pertaining to the specimen in hand are chosen
by the user, and entities that do not pertain to those states are sequentially
eliminated until only one entity remains - the answer!
A second advantage of interactive keys is that they are multi-access.
The user is not required to enter the key at only one point, and follow
a standard, fixed sequence of couplets as in a dichotomous key. Instead,
the user can enter the key at any available feature and proceed to any
other available feature. On the other hand, most interactive key software
comes with a powerful set of automated tools to guide the user through
the best choice of features to identify an entity (these are explained
in the tutorial).
A third, but not final, advantage of interactive keys is that images,
photographs, html files, hyperlinks, and other media can be easily attached
to the key and accessed by the user at any time during the identification
process.
Return
to tutorial
|