![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chironomid communities as water quality indicators in Twin Cities metro area lakes M.S. Thesis project Introduction Chironomidae (Diptera) are a family of small flies whose larval stage makes up over 50% of the benthic macroinvertebrate community. They are such a diverse and widespread family that they can subsist in most climates and a wide range of water qualities (Saether 1979, Coffman and Ferrington 1996). These characteristics make them excellent candidates in monitoring water for the presence of pollution and determining the lake trophic level. If chironomid communities were assessed in TCMA lakes, a more complete and comprehensive picture of water quality could be understood. In this proposal, a more efficient technique becoming widely accepted for chironomid sampling is recommended for TCMA lakes. Traditionally, the chironomid larval stage has been used in macrobenthos studies, however chironomids are holometabolous and therefore their lifecycle also includes a pupal stage. When the pupa is fully developed, it swims to the surface and the adult emerges. The remaining pupal skin (exuviae) floats on the water’s surface for a few days and can be collected easily with a sieve. These exuviae take one-third the time to process than do larvae, and in addition they allow for better taxonomic resolution (Ferrington et. al. 1991). Along with the increased ease in collecting and identifying chironomids, comes the opportunity to create a model of lake trophic levels using Chironomidae communities. Ole Saether (1979) developed a model for predicting Holarctic lake trophic classification by grouping holarctic chironomid species (131 in all, 88 of which are found in North America) into 15 communities representing different lake trophic conditions. Six communities were characteristic of oligotrophic lakes, three of mesotrophic lakes and six of eutrophic lakes. From this classification, he concluded that chironomid communities are distributed across a curve of total phosphorus/mean lake depth and chlorophyll a/mean lake depth (see Figure 1). This model could be refined for the TCMA lakes, and would aid local agencies and the community immensely when determining the recreational and ecological habitat qualities of lakes. In 2002, Les Ruse used pupal exuviae to characterize the distribution of chironomids in lakes of the United Kingdom and found alkalinity and lake volume to be the most predictable measures of species communities. My primary research objective is to determine the chironomid species in TCMA lakes and compare the results to the PCA and TCMC water chemistry measures to develop a model for predicting urban lake classification based on chironomid communities. This procedure could include revising Saether’s model for the TCMA, or developing a new model depending on which water chemistry measures fit a curve with chironomid community distribution. My secondary research objective is to compile a comprehensive list of chironomid species found in urban areas of the Upper Midwest Region and determine if there are any undescribed species present. Thirdly I will determine how many sampling dates are needed and when are the best times of the year to get a good picture of the chironomid community of urban lakes. Lastly, using pupal exuviae, I will make it easier and more affordable to do chironomid community assessments in the Twin Cities lakes by developing a key to pupal exuviae that would be useful to biologists in urban areas of this region, including the PCA and TCMC. Methods I will collect Surface Floating Pupal Exuviae (Ferrington et al. 1991) monthly from April to November 2005. The sampling will consist of 8 dates/lake x 16 lakes x 1 sample/lake/date = 128 total samples. Finally, I will identify the pupal exuviae to the lowest resolution possible and draw them for a key that will be useful for biologists in urban areas of the Upper Midwest Region. This key would also be available on a website for use in the public community. With the creation of this key and it’s wide availability, the ease in identifying chironomids would give a much more comprehensive picture of water quality and the community can easily get involved in further monitoring of this valuable resource. Sample Lakes
Figure 1. Sample lake locations. Data Analysis Preliminary references Hall, Roland I., Peter R. Leavitt, Roberto Quinlan, Aruna S. Dixit, and John P. Smol. 1999. Effects of agriculture, urbanization, and climate on water quality in the northern Great Plains. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44(3, part 2) 739-756. Heiskary, Steven and Ed Swain. 2002. Water Quality Reconstruction from Fossil Diatoms: Apllications for Trend Assessment, Model Verification, and Development of Nutrient Criteria for Lakes in Minnesota, USA. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Environmental Outcomes Division, St. Paul, Mn. Ruse, Les. 2002. Chironomid pupal exuviae as indicators of lake status. Arch. Hydrobiol. 153(3): 367-390. Saether, O. 1975. Chironomid communities as water quality indicators. Holarctic Ecology 2: 65-74. Twin Cities Metropolitan Council (TCMC). 2003. Aquatic Resource Assessment for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Natural Resources Inventory and Assessment. Wilson, R.S. 1980. Pp.209-216. In: Chironomidae
Ecology, Systematics, Cytology and Physiology, D. A. Murray (ed.). Proceedings
of the 7th International Symposium on Chironomidae. Pergammon Press,
Dublin. 354 pp. |
Moriya Rufer sampling Lake Elmo
Cedar Lake in April, Scott County, MN
Christmas Lake in April, Hennepin County, MN
Little Long Lake in April, Hennepin County, MN
Colby Lake in April, Washington County, MN
Square Lake in August, Washington County, MN
Lake McCarrons in August, Ramsey County, MN
Lake Gervais in August, Ramsey County, MN
Schutz Lake in August, Carver County, MN
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||